INDUSTRY & MAINTENANCE

Predictive maintenance: fix it before it stops

Predictive maintenance with TIMi anticipates the failure of an equipment from the operating data you already collect, so an intervention can be planned before an unplanned stop, and shows the factors behind each alert.


Risk per machine

Each equipment gets a risk level at a horizon you define.


Works with existing data

Controllers, logs and production databases are often enough to start.


Explained alerts

Each alert tells the team what to check.

HOW IT WORKS


How predictive maintenance works.

Three steps, in one engine, on a standard server with no cluster.


1. Prepare the data

Anatella gathers the operating data (sensors, operating logs, maintenance history) and the history of past failures, then structures them into variables.


2. Build the model

Modeler compares the signals that came before known failures with the ones observed now, and estimates a risk of failure at a given horizon, even when the failure history is limited.


3. Alert and explain

Each equipment gets a risk level with the factors behind it, such as a drift in an operating parameter or a combination of signals already seen before a past failure.

Data prep / ETL
Anatella
Sensors, logs, maintenance and failure history
Automated machine learning
Modeler
Failure risk at a chosen horizon
Alert
Risk level and the factors to check
Illustration: the three steps, in one engine.

GETTING IT RIGHT


Choices that shape a maintenance model.

Failures are rare, and that shapes the approach.

Work with rare failures

Failures are a tiny share of the data. At Safran, fewer than 0.5% of 10 billion rows corresponded to a breakdown. Modeler is designed to extract a usable signal from a limited failure history, using all the operating variables available.

Start with the data you have

A model can often be built from data already collected by existing systems, before considering extra sensors. At Safran, the first model was deployed within a week with no new sensor.

Plan for changing conditions

A change of operating conditions, such as a new pace or a new environment, can change the warning signals. Modeler’s Drift Report shows when a model needs an update. At SANY, models built in summer decayed in winter, and the Drift Report made the shift visible.

EXPLAINABILITY


An alert says it will fail. The factors say what to check.

An alert alone says an equipment is at risk, not why. A white-box model shows the factors behind the alert for this machine, so maintenance teams can prepare the right intervention (part to replace, type of check) instead of starting from a generic signal.


For maintenance teams

An intervention can be planned and equipped in advance, knowing the probable cause of the risk.


For trust in the system

Technical teams adopt more easily a system whose logic they can check than an alert they cannot question.


For model owners

Modeler’s built-in Drift Report shows when a model loses accuracy, so you update it when needed instead of on a fixed calendar.

Why this machine was flagged
Drift of an operating parameter
Signal combination seen before a past failure
Operating load
Time since the last maintenance
Illustration: relative weight of the factors for a typical case. Not real data.

DATA


What data a maintenance model uses.

Anatella connects to more than 80 sources, so this data can be gathered without prior custom development.


Sensor and operating data

Temperature, vibration, pressure, depending on the equipment.


Logs and maintenance history

Operating logs and maintenance already carried out.


Past failures

Even in limited number.


Operating conditions

Load, environment, pace.

PROOF


Predictive maintenance in production.

Three industrial deployments, in aerospace, mining and oil.

Safran | Aerospace manufacturing

94% of failures anticipated 30 minutes ahead

Machines that make aircraft engine blades 24/7. 10 billion rows analyzed on a standard server, with no new sensor.

SANY | Mining trucks

Engine failures predicted within the hour

AUC above 98% with 355 correlated variables and only 107 historical failures.

GX Labs | Oil wells

€19.6 million of repair costs avoided a year

GX Labs

Failure models on 5,000 wells and 500 sensors also added €1.3 million of revenue a year.

FAQ


Common questions.

Do we need many past failures to train a model?

Not necessarily. Modeler is designed to extract a usable signal from a limited number of failures, using all the operating variables available rather than the volume of incidents alone. At SANY, the model was trained on only 107 historical failures.

Do we need to install new sensors?

Not necessarily. A model can often be built from the data already collected by existing systems, before considering extra sensors if a missing signal is identified.

How long does it take to deploy a first model?

Once the operating data is gathered and accessible, a first model can be built quickly. At Safran, a first model was deployed on site within a week.

Does the model need retraining if operating conditions change?

Yes, a change of conditions can change the warning signals. Modeler’s Drift Report shows when an update is needed.

RELATED USE CASES


Keep exploring.


Equipment Failure Prediction

Estimate the probability that an equipment fails at a given horizon, and why.

Read more

Equipment Downtime Prediction

Estimate how long a stop will last and what it will cost in output.

Read more

Model Drift Monitoring

See when a predictive model loses accuracy and needs an update.

Read more

SEE FOR YOURSELF


Test it on your own data.

Run TIMi on your own data with a free trial, or talk to us about your case.

Opens in a new tab